How Did Zaroff Solve His Hunting Dilemma?

How did Zaroff solve his hunting dilemma? He “invented” a new animal to hunt: humans. He is giving Rainsford the choice to join his hunt or be hurt by Ivan, which is the choice he gives his other victims.

How does General Zaroff justify his new way of hunting?

Zaroff justifies hunting people because he is trapping ships and taking sailors. If he kills them, he believes that means they are weak and deserve to die. He uses the survival of the fittest argument, saying, Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs be, taken by the strong.

You might be interested:  FAQ: When Is The Alligator Hunting Season In Louisiana?

How does Rainsford resolve his conflict with Zaroff?

The conflict between Rainsford and Zaroff is brought about by Zaroff’s irrational desire to hunt and animal of intelligence, a bill which Rainsford readily fills. It is resolved when a more intelligent Rainsford out thinks Zaroff and overcomes him in his own bedroom at the end of the story.

What was General Zaroff’s dilemma regarding hunting?

Zaroff tells Rainsford that he became bored with hunting because he was too good at tracking and killing animals and because modern weaponry had given human hunters too much of an advantage over their quarry.

Why did Zaroff stop hunting Rainsford?

He leaves because he hasn’t finished having fun with Rainsford. He doesn’t want the hunt to end so quickly and is probably impressed by the difficult trail Rainsford cut through the jungle. He wants to see how else the American might choose to elude him. Zaroff lives for the “game.”

How does Zaroff obtain the animal he hunts and how does he justify hunting this animal?

How does Zaroff obtain the species he hunts and how does he justify his hunting this species? He traps ships on islands then captures the crew. Then he takes them into his training where he feeds and train them, then he chooses some men to go into the jungle for a hunt.

What is Zaroff’s main reason for preferring to hunt human beings rather than animals?

What is Zaroff’s main reason for preferring to hunt human beings rather than animals? There is no other big game on his island. He doesn’t like to kill innocent creatures. He hates humanity and wants to take revenge against it.

You might be interested:  Quick Answer: What Type Of Shotgun Pellets Are Allowed For Waterfowl Hunting?

Does the end of the story resolve the difference between Rainsford and Zaroff?

Second, since the game that Zaroff created is one of life and death, the game and conflict is only resolved when Rainsford goes on the offense and attacks Zaroff. In the last scene of the story Rainsford meets Zaroff in his house and presumably kills him.

What skills helped Rainsford escape an untimely death?

What skills helped Rainsford escape an untimely death? What skills of Zaroff’s made escape difficult? His knowledge of knowing the whole island. The ability to track a hunter.

What does Rainsford learn by the end of the story?

When Rainsford is being hunted on the island by the crazy General Zaroff, he learns fear. He knows what it means to be a hunted animal. Most interestingly, it is revealed at the end of the story that Rainsford kills Zaroff. Perhaps Rainsford also learns that he can kill a man and enjoy his sleep.

What is General Zaroff’s biggest dilemma?

General Zaroff is bored with hunting animals. Because of them, he feels he can make his own rules, and doesn’t have to follow society’s.

What moral dilemma does General Zaroff suggest in this passage?

What moral dilemma does General Zaroff suggest in this passage? whether hunting animals can be justified.

What is Zaroff’s point of view?

The creature Zaroff is hunting is other humans. In his perspective, humans are the only worthy animal that he hasn’t hunted, as well as the only ones capable of reason. He thinks this will make a hunted human more intelligent and therefore difficult to hunt than an animal, since an animal is nothing more than instinct.

You might be interested:  Often asked: When Is Hunting Season Over In Ga?

What happens to Zaroff at the end of the story?

At the end of the story General Zaroff died. At the end of the story General Zaroff died. In spite of being hurt, Zaroff congratulates Rainsford on his “Malay mancatcher,” why? He congratulates him because all that Zaroff cared about was the hunt and he was having a good time.

Why did General Zaroff not end the game after the first day?

General Zaroff had long ago become bored with hunting even the biggest of wild animals, and he had turned his attentions to a more dangerous game: the human kind. Rainsford was astounded at Zaroff’s tracking skills, and Zaroff could have put a quick end to the game after the first day.

How does Rainsford’s attitude towards hunting change during the story what changes it?

How does Rainsford’s attitude change because of his experience? He has more sympathy for the hunted, like Whitney. Since he now knew how it felt about how it was like being hunted, he feels more sympathetic towards the hunted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *